Saturday, 24 June 2017

Month 3 Review


3% Compounding Lay Bets

Month 3

Start Bank :     £93.68

End Bank :      £111.04

ROI :               18.53

Bank Highest : £115.32

Bank Lowest : £92.05

Total Lay Bets: 39

Total Wins :     22

Total Loses:     17

Strike Rate:    56.415

The performance of Little Acorns for month 3 has been exceptional

From a low of £92.05 to current bank of £111.04 has proved the system can work. Albeit from a negative bank the system has pulled back and produced an overall ROI of 11.04 from start of trial. So just over a 11% return for 3 months is very good.

The chart below is level stakes and has performed better


Level Stakes

The current bank with level stakes is £115.03,  so just under £4  to the the better. This is a recommended stake plan by the author although this system is not tested by the bot.

So overall we could expect a return of 30% or more for 12 months, although small beer on these stakes it would be conceivable to achieve @£450 per month based on a 3 % bank by multiplying the original bank by 30.

I have been using another staking plan which has been working on the Bot since I started the trial, I will release more on this later.

Thanks for reading

Andy



6 comments:

  1. Hi,
    are you only betting on races with 6 or more runners?

    flovac

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Flovac

      I am betting on 5 or more runners

      Andy

      Delete
  2. Do you plan on upping your stakes?

    Does the author suggest 5 or more runners as I was doing all runners?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Chris

      No there are no plans to increase stake, this is purely a test to see if Little Acorns can perform as the author states.

      Your other question has raised a very good point.

      I thought it said in the manual that 5 or more runners were required. However that is not the case it would appear if there are 3 horses and they match the conditions required for placing a lay then the bet should be placed.

      Can you tell me if you have had any more success with this method than the trial I have been running?

      I may have to consider changing the bot.

      Thanks

      Andy

      Delete
    2. I had success yes. However more recently I havent but I missed lots of race days so its not a fair representation.

      I initially thought your results were poor but 11% is a good return compared to most systems.

      I'm going to cross check your return with the latest results from the sales page.

      Good luck

      Delete
    3. Apologies for the late posting. That will be interesting to see what you find, however the system is not preforming very well this month. I will consider changing the rule regarding number of runners, to follow the system as per your suggestion.

      Thanks

      Delete